2,738 | 2 | 30 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
设计有效的生态环境治理机制是处理好高质量发展与高水平保护的关键。环境保护税作为市场型环境规制工具,通过改变污染排放与治理的相对价格来影响企业的绿色投资决策。以2018年环境保护税改革作为外生冲击,构建三重差分识别框架,评估了环境保护税对企业绿色投资的激励效应,并考虑环境保护税与其他环境政策的协同治理效应。研究发现,环境保护税有效激励了企业绿色投资,对重污染企业的影响更为明显。这主要源于环境保护税改革激励了企业绿色创新并引致了更多的绿色投资需求,企业也相应获得了更多的环保补助。从激励效应的特征来看,该政策诱致了企业对源头治理和末端治理的策略性环保投资,激励了重污染企业更加注重源头治理。同时,该政策存在显著的异质性特征和协同效应,政策效果在国有企业、融资约束小的企业和税收征管力度强地区的企业表现得更为明显,并与碳排放权交易、大气污染防控、固定资产加速折旧、能效信贷和绿色金融改革等政策产生了良好的协同激励效应。
Abstract:Designing an effective governance mechanism is the key to dealing with high-quality development and high-level protection. As a market-based environmental regulation tool,environmental protection tax can affect enterprises' green investment decisions by changing the relative price of pollution emissions and governance. Taking the environmental protection tax policy reform in 2018 as an exogenous shock,this paper constructs a triple differential identification framework,evaluates the incentive effect of environmental protection tax on corporate green investment,and considers the collaborative governance effect of environmental protection tax and other macro policies. The study finds that the environmental protection tax effectively stimulates the green investment of enterprises,and the impact on heavily polluting enterprises is more obvious. This is mainly due to the fact that the environmental protection tax reform stimulates the green innovation of enterprises and leads to more green investment demand,and enterprises also receive more environmental protection subsidies accordingly. From the perspective of the characteristics of the incentive effect,the policy induces enterprises to make strategic environmental protection investment in source control and end control,and encourages heavy polluting enterprises to pay more attention to source control.At the same time,the policy has significant heterogeneity and synergy characteristics. The policy effect is more obvious in state-owned enterprises,enterprises with small financing constraints and enterprises in areas with strong tax collection and management,and has a good synergistic incentive effect with policies such as carbon emission trading,air pollution prevention and control,accelerated depreciation of fixed assets,energy efficiency credit and green financial reform.
[1]Chiroleu-Assouline M,Fodha M.From regressive pollution taxes to progressive environmental tax reforms[J].European Economic Review,2014,69(05):126-142.
[2]李青原,肖泽华.异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励——来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J].经济研究,2020,55(09):192-208.
[3]田利辉,关欣,李政,等.环境保护税费改革与企业环保投资——基于《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验[J].财经研究,2022,48(09):32-46+62.
[4]黄纪强,祁毓.环境税能否倒逼产业结构优化与升级?——基于环境“费改税”的准自然实验[J].产业经济研究,2022(02):1-13.
[5]刘金科,肖翊阳.中国环境保护税与绿色创新:杠杆效应还是基础效应?[J].经济研究,2022(01):72-88.
[6]李远慧,李沛垚.环境保护税对企业绿色技术创新水平的影响——基于沪深A股上市工业企业的分析[J].税务研究,2022(11):52-58.
[7]Li Z,Liao G,Wang Z,et al.Green loan and subsidy for promoting clean production innovation[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,187(18):421-431.
[8]Wang Y,Zhang Y.Do state subsidies increase corporate environmental spending?[J].International Review of Financial Analysis,2020,72(06):101592.
[9]Truong Y,Mazloomi H,Berrone P.Understanding the impact of symbolic and substantive environmental actions on organizational reputation[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2021,92(01):307-320.
[10]Porter M E, Van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J].The Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(04):97-118.
[11]Lian G H,Xu A T, Zhu Y H.Substantive green innovation or symbolic green innovation? The impact of ER on enterprise green innovation based on the dual moderating effects[J]. Journal of Innovation&Knowledge,2022,7(03):100203.
[12]Du L Z,Lin W F,Du J H,et al.Can vertical environmental regulation induce enterprise green innovation? A new perspective from automatic air quality monitoring station in China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2022,317(17):115349.
[13]郭俊杰,方颖,杨阳.排污费征收标准改革是否促进了中国工业二氧化硫减排[J].世界经济,2019,42(01):121-144.
[14]Haller S A,Murphy L.Corporate expenditure on environmental protection[J].Resource and Environmental Economics,2012,51(02):277-296.
[15]张晨,曹雨清,胡梦.市场激励型环境规制对企业环保投资的影响——基于我国碳排放权交易机制的准自然实验[J].金融与经济,2021(11):4-13.
[16]由于篇幅限制,稳健性检验部分的结果留存备索。
[17]Mertens J. Measuring tax effort in Central and Eastern Europe[J].Public Finance and Management,2003,3(04):530-563.
[18]习近平.推进生态文明建设需要处理好几个重大关系[J].求是,2023(22):4-7.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19624/j.cnki.cn42-1005/c.2024.10.010
中图分类号:X322;F812.42;F275
引用信息:
[1]徐彦坤,黄纪强,祁毓.环境保护税与企业绿色投资:激励与协同视角[J].学习与实践,2024,No.488(10):90-100.DOI:10.19624/j.cnki.cn42-1005/c.2024.10.010.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金青年项目“绿色信贷与环境信用联动对企业绿色转型的影响:机制、效应与制度优化”(项目编号:72103208); 中南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“绿色财政金融政策对企业绿色转型的影响评估及制度优化”(项目编号:CSPT23012)